Date: Sat, 2 Nov 1996 22:59:58 +0300 (MSK) From: "=?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?=" (Andrey A. Chernov) <ache@nagual.ru> To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/ssh/patches patch-ae Message-ID: <199611021959.WAA00408@nagual.ru> In-Reply-To: <199611021844.TAA28482@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at "Nov 2, 96 07:44:04 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
]> As [?KOI8-R?] wrote: > > > > As i read it, that's an overall change. Are you sure this is the > > > right thing to do? > > > > Yes, in other case _all_ ssh messages goes to nowhere. > > Not necessarily. If ssh logs something at level daemon.notice, it > _gets_ logged. (Only daemon.info and daemon.debug would get dropped > by default.) If it logs failed authentication attempts as > auth.notice, however, this is better -- but LOG_AUTH is just only for > authentication stuff. No, it don't log anything with *.notice, only *.info used, it is why /var/log/message not used by ssh. > Again, i haven't looked there for which kind of syslog messages it's > being used. (I don't have the ssh source handy here at home.) Please, take a look. Or our discussion will cover all possible theoretical cases... -- Andrey A. Chernov <ache@nagual.ru> http://www.nagual.ru/~ache/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611021959.WAA00408>