From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Apr 21 17:16:16 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 442055EC0F1 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FQRzN1RPbz3nnd; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:16:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from John-Baldwins-MacBook-Pro.local (ralph.baldwin.cx [66.234.199.215]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: jhb) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8091829785; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Review D28062 of /usr/src/UPDATING with regard to upgrading FreeBSD and inconsistency with the FreeBSD Handbook To: driesm.michiels@gmail.com, 'Graham Perrin' , 'freebsd-current' References: <705578b0-9d8e-3ad2-77c2-96a20ad3a16e@gmail.com> <000e01d7342f$a5f25b70$f1d71250$@gmail.com> From: John Baldwin Message-ID: <890a62be-95f1-9a67-b76b-da847ae138b7@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 10:16:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000e01d7342f$a5f25b70$f1d71250$@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 17:16:16 -0000 On 4/18/21 1:48 AM, driesm.michiels@gmail.com wrote: >> If etcupdate -p fails before make installworld, then should the subsequent >> etcupdate be with or without option -B ? > > -p and -B are not related. > > -p deals with changes needed for a correct run of installworld (see above). > > -B uses a freshly built world to speed up the tree comparison; although no > flags work fine here as well, so -B is not necessarily required. Technically -B speeds up generating the tree to compare against as it assumes /usr/obj is up to date and uses that instead of rebuilding some files generated by buildworld normally. The actual tree comparison isn't affected. -- John Baldwin