From owner-freebsd-current  Thu Dec 14 21:26:14 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA24394
          for current-outgoing; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 21:26:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jhome.DIALix.COM (root@jhome.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.69])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA24387
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 14 Dec 1995 21:26:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from julian@localhost) by jhome.DIALix.COM (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA03498; Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:25:27 +0800 (WST)
From: Julian Elischer <julian@jhome.DIALix.COM>
Message-Id: <199512150525.NAA03498@jhome.DIALix.COM>
Subject: Re: FreeBSD shines in security audit
To: uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org (Frank Durda IV)
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 1995 13:25:27 +0800 (WST)
Cc: current@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <m0tQRMv-000CecC@nemesis.lonestar.org> from "Frank Durda IV" at Dec 14, 95 10:03:00 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Of course, the attack the package performed didn't even rank up to stuff
> that 3rd graders are probably trying these days, but it still annoyed IS 
> that these "evil little FreeBSD systems"  (translation: they didn't
> cost anything so IS didn't get a say in their purchase) got no black
> marks from the auditors, and some of the expensive systems that IS did
> purchase did get caught.
> 
> Good job to all who worked on 2.1!

I bet they were pissed off that you even CAUGHT them..
while no-one else did :)

> 
> Frank Durda IV <uhclem@nemesis.lonestar.org>|"The purpose of IS is to obtain
> 					    | computer systems and then to do
> 			                    | everything possible to avoid 
> ...rwsystr.nkn.net!nemesis!uhclem           | letting the systems be used."
> 
>