From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jan  7 11:49:08 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0AE7816A4CE; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 11:49:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0747E43D45; Fri,  7 Jan 2005 11:49:05 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j07BmMBY042537;
	Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:18:23 +1030 (CST)
	(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au)
From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 22:18:11 +1030
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
References: <41DE4F3D.8050509@syskonnect.de>
	<20050107092110.GG49329@submonkey.net> <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net>
In-Reply-To: <20050107101006.GA2553@frontfree.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501072218.20970.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
X-Spam-Score: -5.4 ()
	IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_KMAIL
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
cc: kamalp@acm.org
cc: Gerald Heinig <gheinig@syskonnect.de>
cc: Robert Ryan <rustyryan882000@yahoo.co.uk>
cc: tjr@freebsd.org
cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>
Subject: Re: Benchmark: NetBSD 2.0 beats FreeBSD 5.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 11:49:08 -0000

--nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 20:40, Xin LI wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:21:10AM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote:
> > I don't really think that this benchmark is bad news for either OS.  My
> > only real concern are the process creation/termination results on
> > FreeBSD.
>
> I guess that this might worth investigating:
>
> 	http://people.freebsd.org/~das/pbench/pbench.html

It's nice to see constructive info amidst the flamage :)

=2D-=20
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C

--nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBB3ncE5ZPcIHs/zowRAuTTAKCHVT4UPYnQP1QK71TxV5Tgax5cIQCglg4B
W+YsMjQzkQwTmpUdwGrO2ww=
=gJcS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1157031.CWLovQAHFV--