From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 9 23:46:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06A1900; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:46:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@tormail.org) Received: from outgoing.tormail.org (outgoing.tormail.org [82.221.96.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4893E8FC0C; Tue, 9 Oct 2012 23:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=internal.tormail.org) by outgoing.tormail.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TLif8-0004oK-H9; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 02:52:31 +0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tormail.org; s=tm; h=Message-Id:X-TorMail-User:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Date:In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=Zb9KeyGGTKSkajmx0dvJz9pMPFIht+NGjotL97xmOOg=; b=Sc8ac/g5DgnQMLQmBxDHxk4NRl98eWqT8giNd/houjnqYUK5f+H1ylYUDw3sUc3krSZIJXfM3P3x1PhHzO5woWfFTAgDXDDwo8OdDwB9pIFVsx3s2K2OZn9LMYUYrBwZ7LYXO2qkkJRFefjj+HwPnSvE+FTFrePjQMs8gE3TvYM=; Received: from jbeich by internal.tormail.org with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1TLidW-000EbL-Lp; Tue, 09 Oct 2012 22:50:51 +0000 From: Jan Beich To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: svn commit: r305288 - head/Mk In-Reply-To: <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> (Baptiste Daroussin's message of "Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:10:09 +0200") Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 12:51:07 -1000 References: <201210042257.q94MvjeY039394@svn.freebsd.org> <20121005202842.GA64496@FreeBSD.org> <20121006080539.GB30675@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <5070A018.9010302@FreeBSD.org> <20121008035621.GA91369@FreeBSD.org> <20121008061249.GA47691@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20121009155946.GA70759@FreeBSD.org> <20121009161009.GF8713@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TorMail-User: jbeich Message-Id: <1TLidW-000EbL-Lp@internal.tormail.org> Cc: svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 23:46:07 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin writes: > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:59:46PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 08:12:50AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> > On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:56:21AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: >> > > That's because OptionsNG poorly implement mutually exclusive options. I >> > > hope that eventually dialog's --radiolist would be utilized for proper >> > > handling, and sane knobs names would be restored. >> > > >> > > Sounds like a nice port junior hacker project. >> > >> > Not hat junior dialog(1) can't mix radiolist and classic checklist that is >> > why it doesn't use it, using libdialog(3), it would be easiy to implement, >> > but that won't be usable for a while (until all supported version of >> > freebsd has it. >> >> Ah, OK, that explains it (lack of radiobuttons now). Is it known what's >> preventing all supported versions to have working libdialog(3), if we have >> working dialog(1) already? >> >> ./danfe > > new dialog is only on 9.x and 10.x, if will require to code some special > dialog(1) dedicated for ports, MFCing libdialog to 8 and 7 is complicated > because the API isn't compatible. Why not add devel/cdialog to bootstrap on < 9.0 and install it only when BATCH is not set? > > regards, > Bapt