From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 18 09:19:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE8561065708; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:19:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58008FC16; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id MAA09311; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:19:03 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1SKR2U-000M11-N6; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:19:02 +0300 Message-ID: <4F8E8705.4080804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 12:19:01 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120317 Thunderbird/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Friesenhahn References: <4F8999D2.1080902@FreeBSD.org> <4F89B567.6090008@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [review request] zfsboot/zfsloader: support accessing filesystems within a pool X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:19:09 -0000 on 15/04/2012 04:01 Bob Friesenhahn said the following: > It would be nice if the updated FreeBSD bootloader could have the ability to > boot both Solaris and FreeBSD root filesystems in the same pool so that one > could switch between several zfs-based operating systems without needing to use > a different partition for each one. Is this within the bounds of possibility or > a totally irrational thought? I can not assess feasibility of such a project. Just want to note that ultimately it's the code that gets booted, not filesystems. I have an impression that Solaris boot archive is quite different from how FreeBSD kernel gets booted. -- Andriy Gapon