Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:30:02 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog Message-ID: <565E9DFA.6050502@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org> References: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 12/2/2015 7:29 AM, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Author: ache > Date: Wed Dec 2 06:29:36 2015 > New Revision: 402813 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/402813 > > Log: > Unbreak port, update to the latest version of Swiss Ephemeris > (It does not require any patching, who mark the port BROKEN > can easily do it by yourself) This is an unfair comment. The *distfile* changed. That implies a poudriere run. THe person marking BROKEN often does it in a batch of a several ports that have starting failing in a bulk run. They aren't looking at *any* of them and rely on the maintainer or a user that cares to figure out what happened. In this case, it's as much work as you can ask without having to generate patches, so I don't agree with the second half of the comment AT ALL.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?565E9DFA.6050502>