From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Dec 2 07:30:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 293E9A3EDD6; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 07:30:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE033105C; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 07:30:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.contact@marino.st) Received: from [192.168.1.22] (253.Red-83-32-1.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.32.1.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676DB43C0D; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 01:30:06 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r402813 - head/misc/astrolog To: "Andrey A. Chernov" , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org References: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org> Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org From: John Marino Message-ID: <565E9DFA.6050502@marino.st> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 08:30:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201512020629.tB26TbDb060296@repo.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 07:30:10 -0000 On 12/2/2015 7:29 AM, Andrey A. Chernov wrote: > Author: ache > Date: Wed Dec 2 06:29:36 2015 > New Revision: 402813 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/402813 > > Log: > Unbreak port, update to the latest version of Swiss Ephemeris > (It does not require any patching, who mark the port BROKEN > can easily do it by yourself) This is an unfair comment. The *distfile* changed. That implies a poudriere run. THe person marking BROKEN often does it in a batch of a several ports that have starting failing in a bulk run. They aren't looking at *any* of them and rely on the maintainer or a user that cares to figure out what happened. In this case, it's as much work as you can ask without having to generate patches, so I don't agree with the second half of the comment AT ALL.