Date: 23 Nov 1999 19:31:42 +0200 From: Vadim Belman <voland@plab.ku.dk> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: speaking of 3.4... Message-ID: <85u2mdunb5.fsf@lflat.dp.ua> In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of "Wed, 24 Nov 1999 02:09:05 %2B0900" References: <3378.943323218@localhost> <383A5B8E.DF84AAA7@newsguy.com> <85903pw3fn.fsf@lflat.dp.ua> <383ACA31.6B5E5BAA@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Daniel!
On 23 Nov 99 at 19:09, "Daniel" (Daniel C Sobral) wrote:
>> While I myself appreciate transformation of 4.0 into -stable because
>> of some useful features and changes I'm looking for, from general point
>> of view wouldn't it be better and make lifetime of 3.x longer?
Daniel> Well, that's your users. The ones I know want new features. They
Daniel> can't have new features without new releases.
"Who wants features uses Windows or Linux." 8) (The source of
sentence has been forgotten.)
They aren't my users. Mostly they need a stable server or a
developer's desktop platform.
--
/Voland Vadim Belman
E-mail: voland@plab.ku.dk
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?85u2mdunb5.fsf>