From nobody Mon Sep 2 15:30:59 2024 X-Original-To: ports-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4WyCQF63LSz5TbJW for ; Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R11" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WyCQF4vnCz4p1K for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1725291061; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=aliUwhvSPwZqBqTSK1G7diTxPgSnVTp/fb6+R4F+KBzpRVAUH1pS/GDWSZetBFSNAI1k2c XxYe+f9UteIBgDyhL9lPOh49NjmYkUi1XEBvaHfoRmPK9jMhazSfX67sP5po/TLp8H5+c0 fbwIBs9fqVcpQvsd5RLbKyKLFn7u2IJAjSXphj8VGmjeM7pCKD4wVqlfuh6AVW3nnYW4pe cPdcgwgpY+ZqX7ep8DfzXDZIRKw4+gyOjGjXp7MhH5VEdpMERcUlajj7z4FqM0GMlii5yZ GJgviNhNOS1GF5egx8KWWdUWVaxbWDOWUtiXIQM30QrcLXGF88qG4Ybz1ocjSA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1725291061; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yQK8mjvB7zy47QmnrOMp6SJDagWfGrOD1WYBPvE5BBo=; b=rgxZh2R4uua5oBkvqRqd5WXMAuGXtvc/9eKKQm5chtIRsf/+GzIZKd7Y9JAMKd8d+VzlyQ 66kpFmrwQNFy80gvB0DCETiOlrFkeonzJz9EtOqDKa9KNeRFbyBcYRhAajUTLbD9rAjon5 lvvWJYRXtIxb4ywq+80X4nKu5s1UdcPknyRwWeGmPEWMIrMAV5TGJeAoWQ6zjKVVe0F0Ne FLnK+LKg3AVOw/jUEhLiggSio4R4b+nJbMB4ygOj1Sa9lHNcDV94iBzpNyGrTdaX1ZomXW chUGs8RWJYb0urqsyAVGouFpCz4jRYwQHF+AZFakxtV1M83ylVjV2caut4qXTg== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4WyCQF4WhTz1HQ9 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:31:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 482FV1c6076166 for ; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:31:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 482FV1lF076156 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 2 Sep 2024 15:31:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 280532] www/forgejo: LTS Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 15:30:59 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: stb@lassitu.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D280532 --- Comment #5 from Stefan Bethke --- I'm not opposed to having an LTS port, it's just that the discussion on the forge-chat matrix channel clearly indicated that Forgejo 7 will not receive= a lot of attention from the dev team. I see that there have been frequent releases, so maybe that discussion is outdated, but given the fast pace of development of Forgejo, I would always recommend to use the latest release. If you would like to maintain an LTS port, you're welcome to do so. If there are many people who feels this would be valuable, I would consider doing th= at, but right now my feeling is that most people running Forgejo are more interested in the newest release. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=