Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 22:35:39 -0700 From: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Why did main's [so: 15's] new aarch64 snapshots have PINE64 (not -LTS) instead of RPI? (has -LTS too) Message-ID: <DB83C4B5-4ACF-4FED-932A-D415F99B2C8B@yahoo.com> References: <DB83C4B5-4ACF-4FED-932A-D415F99B2C8B.ref@yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
h= ttps://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000308.ht= ml [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231019 fb7140b1f928)] reported (note "RPI"): o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 RPI o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD = https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-snapshots/2023-October/000310.h= tml [New FreeBSD snapshots available: main (20231026 d3a36e4b7459) ] reported (note "PINE64" without "-LTS" and lack of "RPI"): o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 GENERIC o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64 o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINE64-LTS o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 PINEBOOK o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCK64 o 15.0-CURRENT aarch64 ROCKPRO64 o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERIC o 15.0-CURRENT riscv64 GENERICSD FYI: = http://ftp3.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/ISO-IMAGES/15.0/?C=3DM&O=3DD= matches what is reported. =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB83C4B5-4ACF-4FED-932A-D415F99B2C8B>