From owner-cvs-all Wed Apr 10 18:46:54 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E6637B41F; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:46:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (athlon.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.3]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.11.6/8.11.4) with ESMTP id g3B1kYJ21877; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g3B1kYtv003484; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by athlon.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id g3B1kYwP003483; Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:46:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 18:46:34 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: "David O'Brien" Cc: Peter Wemm , Ruslan Ermilov , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/gperf Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grodvi Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grohtml Makefile src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/src/devices/grolbp Makefile sr Message-ID: <20020411014634.GA3463@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20020408144719.B92702@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020408232040.459C33811@overcee.wemm.org> <20020408191029.B93005@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020410044821.GA10113@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <20020410180443.D84993@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020410180443.D84993@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 06:04:43PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > > > I think only PROG_CXX is better. This automaticly means that PROG > > is for C. Always... > > There is a patch that implements PROG= such that we can remove the > explicit linkage of libstdc++. Unless someone writes and commits the > PROG_CXX, we have no better option than to commit ru's patch. I'm aware of that. I wouldn't mind seeing ru's patch being committed if it was understood that the PROG_CXX solution would cause it to be reverted. I hope that ru's patch and a subsequent PROG_CXX change would not result in having both at the same time, because that would be broken. In short: if we like something quick, then ru's patch is the best we have right now... -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message