From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 03:40:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7366616A4CE; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:40:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw4.prodigy.net (mtaw4.prodigy.net [64.164.98.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B5443D46; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:40:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (db46d3484742175bc1d6ad538d149733@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw4.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2HBeWVM015299; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:40:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2E48851932; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:40:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 03:40:29 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: "David O'Brien" Message-ID: <20040317114028.GA62685@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403170818.i2H8IFYU008824@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040317112344.GB86662@dragon.nuxi.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: Gerald Pfeifer cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/gcc34 Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 11:40:36 -0000 --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 03:23:44AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 11:50:52AM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > I'm afraid I know. Your commit apparently broke the port an all platfo= rms > > but amd64. :-( > >=20 > > Have you tested this following the instructions at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port= ing-testing.html > > ? For invasive changes like this, I'd like to ask you to always test at > > least i386 when committing changes to ports that I maintain. >=20 > I *DID* test on i386 (5.2-CURRENT, full 'make world' just before testing > the port). Do you have additional bsd.port.mk patches in your tree? The comment in your commit log about bsd.port.mk now using a different default value of CONFIGURE_TARGET seemed odd to me - there were patches proposed to change this, but they were never committed because they broke a lot of ports. Kris --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAWDksWry0BWjoQKURAs8rAJ0WDdIrItvuRKK5OTABiAL9IubV1QCeI8HI x6pDfK9EqdE+zQNwY+EJ47w= =iqZj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xHFwDpU9dbj6ez1V--