From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 23 14:25:45 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA12656 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 14:25:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vlsi1.vlsi.fi (vlsi1.vlsi.fi [193.64.2.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA12632 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 14:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from layout.vlsi.fi by vlsi1.vlsi.fi with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA250955937; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:25:38 +0300 Received: by layout.vlsi.fi (1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA099945937; Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:25:37 +0300 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 1996 00:25:37 +0300 Message-Id: <199610232125.AA099945937@layout.vlsi.fi> From: Ville Eerola To: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi Asami) Cc: freebsd-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/1866: popclient flushes remote mailbox even with local failure In-Reply-To: <199610232042.NAA25830@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> References: <199610232027.AA099742432@layout.vlsi.fi> <199610232042.NAA25830@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> X-Mailer: VM Version 5.93 (beta) under GNU Emacs 19.29.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami writes: > Oh, ok. So should we delete popclient from the ports tree then? Probably, since it has been obsoleted by fetchmail. There are some minor feature changes, however. I think we should first wait until people have had time to try the new port out... > Satoshi Regards, Ville -- Ville.Eerola@vlsi.fi VLSI Solution Oy Tel:+358 3 3165579 Hermiankatu 6-8 C Fax:+358 3 3165220 FIN-33720 Tampere, Finland