From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 29 18: 5:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from russian-caravan.cloud9.net (russian-caravan.cloud9.net [168.100.1.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A956E37B410 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 18:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from earl-grey.cloud9.net (earl-grey.cloud9.net [168.100.1.1]) by russian-caravan.cloud9.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0EB28BF5 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 21:05:25 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 21:05:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Peter Leftwich X-X-Sender: To: FreeBSD LIST Subject: mv vs. tar Message-ID: <20020529210249.J77775-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> Organization: Video2Video Services - http://Www.Video2Video.Com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG When moving a large directory (hoping to preserve ALL modification times), is it better/smarter to use the "mv" command, or first "tar" the directory then "untar" it to the new location? Some interesting debate to follow... -- Peter Leftwich President & Founder Video2Video Services Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039 USA +1-413-403-9555 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message