From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 29 23:29:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398B116A420 for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AF4B43D7F for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCE81A4D82; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 15:29:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 045A551314; Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:29:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 18:29:00 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Thomas Uhrfelt Message-ID: <20051129232900.GA60155@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20051129205856.GA56685@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051129210258.0AC1A206D0@mail.plymovent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20051129210258.0AC1A206D0@mail.plymovent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 'Kris Kennaway' Subject: Re: SV: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.6: Undefined symbol "stpcpy" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 23:29:14 -0000 --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:02:06PM +0100, Thomas Uhrfelt wrote: > Thanks, but shouldn't that really be in the handbook? It should. It would be great if you could submit a PR with the relevant change. > I ran out of time today and since it's a production system I need to > wait until tomorrow to se what happens. Would it kill me to use > packages (fetch) when doing this? No, in fact using portupgrade -faPP is probably the best way, as long as you don't have excessive customizations (WITH_*/WITHOUT_*) that you rely on. Kris --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDjOQ8Wry0BWjoQKURAjLMAJ92LUZn5sAjUMqCF/HKnpnKzbbh3QCgkxYZ LUNCAgaGKr38C92Dl/n4k3U= =7W8t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--