From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:59:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB84A7A6; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com (mail-we0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A45793; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id k48so46873wev.0; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:59:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=FHj9dL4HI58mmuFTMP2TrFYnE2dIXNsEBYQxME6xNBk=; b=OWWO68jLOaT89zJWJyUVu8MBOjuJldk51RYSldI9C8aS1pm++bDgJY3zXPnBxVqW5g prniqv6hO9+XoEE11KriGsdgSET694Ukr2dLXwXsixlpYatICaoneHP01onvir+/S6Ol /+MZec1r5IbunDBTZzK8LVE+FZUtD9mDbEqiBqa6LcHSaA3gB6rGUdQxD4IrTdsiv05v 9y8/s7KV+WDp+NJMOpY2PNrQrwY5kJBAG9x1h2OfpACXNYSCYV8zfOZL9uRD4wRdBDYU wJXpbMeErv0FF4APxKnR7hmsYRKKGgXF8oAQRsGEKkLLVqFvL6nx2gHxRLNaASRsm3ZB BBiw== X-Received: by 10.195.17.137 with SMTP id ge9mr57220297wjd.44.1423609184879; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x18sm446600wia.12.2015.02.10.14.59.43 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 10 Feb 2015 14:59:43 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 23:59:42 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Greg 'groggy' Lehey Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150210225941.GU29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <20150210224937.GE58387@eureka.lemis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150210224937.GE58387@eureka.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 22:59:47 -0000 --O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:49:37AM +1100, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Tuesday, 10 February 2015 at 23:38:54 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure for= that I > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove the = old make > > from base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. >=20 > How does this affect non-system Makefiles that depend on pmake? Is > bmake completely upward compatible? There are very few issues, not that fmake is available from ports, I think = 99% of the compatibility are preserved I know about a couple of incompatibiliti= es that are bothering me in ports (for the infrastructure) but I would say thi= s is very much a corner case Bapt --O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTajV0ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EyP+QCfdt0cIK357EaAD/cCWMCBs3KH nEMAoLpV5H2BNrASUe7McksuZGAauuHA =NOp1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --O9T4zNOkGnr0n+A/--