Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2013 18:03:27 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> Cc: Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: considering i386 as a tier 1 architecture Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr%2BJVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAF6rxgnYOwAPnpykTAN-Eu=oeee_uBMt1ud8U4RpyKLO5S257Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOgwaMt2Qvt8c4YvRLJ23sqpODvb00XgwY7Czr%2BJVALXmK1wLA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> that it is NOT necessary to make it a first class branch . 1 Giga Bytes , > and even 2 Giga Bytes memory chips are disappearing from the computer shops > slowly . at now 2GB RAM is smallest you can get, and intel atom is lowest end - but still 64-bit - CPU. > At present , there is NO any processor which is ONLY 32-bits . Not only the > Windows Server , if I am not remembering incorrectly , new regular Windows it should not matter what microsoft do. It is Unix.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1304011802360.97433>