From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 9 09:18:50 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E5616A41F; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:18:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vsevolod@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx.jet.msk.su (mx.jet.msk.su [62.117.74.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFD7F43D45; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 09:18:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vsevolod@FreeBSD.org) Received: from host1.internal.jet.msk.su ([193.124.4.1] helo=tiger.jet.su) by mx.jet.msk.su with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E2QFu-0003HJ-J4; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:18:42 +0400 Received: from [192.168.10.144] (helo=kiwi.service.jet.msk.su ident=postfix) by tiger.jet.su with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1E2QFp-0006Dm-Mc; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:18:37 +0400 Received: from [192.168.10.62] (hds-mita.service.jet.msk.su [192.168.10.62]) by kiwi.service.jet.msk.su (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12331BD65; Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:18:33 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <42F873F0.7060708@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:14:24 +0400 From: Vsevolod Stakhov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050203) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sergey Matveychuk References: <20050808113340.GD71954@spray.anyhost.ru> <42F85865.3010406@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <42F85865.3010406@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.database.mk suggestion X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 09:18:50 -0000 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Vsevolod Stakhov wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I think bsd.database.mk is now more or less ready. But I want >> to listen your comments about it. Now I've moved all mysql/pgsql >> related stuff from bsd.port.mk to bsd.database.mk and added >> bdb handling and sqlite dependency. > > > A symantics for variables is differ. I'm not sure it's a good thing. > E.g. > USE_MYSQL - yes|undefined > WANT_MYSQL_VER - mysql version a maintainer wants > WITH_MYSQL_VER - mysql version an user wants > The same for PostgreSQL. > > But you use USE_DBD_VER= yes|version. > USE_DBD_VER=yes is weird. > > > I dislike _VER suffix for USE_FOO. > Well, I dislike WANT_FOO too. I think it's a surcharge. > > I like this scheme: > USE_SOMEDB= yes|version Yes, I like this too. But it can confuse those people that are common to mysql/pgsql semantics. On the other hand bdb differs from mysql/pgsql as its version are not conflicting. So things like USE_BDB= yes and WANT_BDB_VER are not a good idea. USE_BDB= yes|version sounds nice, I think. > It's just like USE_GCC do. >