From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Jun 16 01:02:38 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA17457 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:02:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA17263 for ; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:01:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA04725; Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:00:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com) To: ben@rosengart.com cc: Sue Blake , Darren Reed , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 2.2.6 CD-ROM : Package dependencies up the creek ? In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:38:41 EDT." Date: Tue, 16 Jun 1998 01:00:25 -0700 Message-ID: <4721.897984025@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > in sysinstall. Why not put a pointer to pkg_manage in the default > /etc/motd, or something like that? Pkg_manage even *looks* like > sysinstall. What's pkg_manage? > I still maintain that package installation is orthogonal to installation > and belongs elsewhere -- namely, in system *configuration*, which can be > done once the OS is safely installed. As evidence, I submit the spate I await the details and first implementation of your design, oh maintaining one. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message