From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 8 21:10:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7344B10656F5 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [192.147.25.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B90A8FC16 for ; Sat, 8 Nov 2008 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from 64.3.1.253.ptr.us.xo.net ([64.3.1.253]:7005 helo=LROSENMAN) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpa (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Kyv4F-0008hS-Rn; Sat, 08 Nov 2008 15:10:05 -0600 From: "Larry Rosenman" To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?'Marcus_M=FCller'?= , References: <20080727125413.GG1345@garage.freebsd.pl> <86tzd490qx.fsf@gmail.com> <20080829074738.GB3026@garage.freebsd.pl> <20081031201814.GA54286@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <73175263-4A61-4C87-9BF3-69ECC2CC0D17@mulle-kybernetik.com> In-Reply-To: <73175263-4A61-4C87-9BF3-69ECC2CC0D17@mulle-kybernetik.com> Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2008 15:09:53 -0600 Message-ID: <005401c941e6$5e660e80$1b322b80$@org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AclBxiUv5sJQFVplQoyckVQ3scv4LQAH+iNQ Content-Language: en-us X-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-LERCTR-Spam-Score: -2.3 (--) X-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.3/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931 X-LERCTR-Spam-Report: SpamScore (-2.3/5.0) ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_OBFU_OTHER=0.135, TVD_RCVD_IP=1.931 DomainKey-Status: no signature Cc: Subject: RE: ZFS patches. X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 21:10:06 -0000 >On 01.11.2008, at 02:39, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> Can you please give us an indication as to when we might expect to see >> either an updated set of ZFS patches (or, better, the patches >> committed >> to -current). > >Me too. ;-) I just want to second that request. While I'm also still >desperately waiting for an update, basically all I'd like to see at >this point is a rough schedule when I/we could expect all the recent >changes in Perforce to be in CVS HEAD for testing. I'd like to 3rd this request. I'm running a -CURRENT system from August with the patches and upgraded ZPOOL/ZFS's. I'd like to get more recent on the system sources, but I know there are issues with the ZFS patch, and would love to see the schedule or a new patch against recent HEAD. Thanks! -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 512-248-2683 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 430 Valona Loop, Round Rock, TX 78681-3893