From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 1 23:36:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A38216A4CE for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:36:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D374943D1F for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 23:36:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id D8BA1148DA; Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:36:40 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:36:40 -0600 (CST) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Joel Dahl In-Reply-To: <1101938949.834.47.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: The future of the FAQ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 23:36:42 -0000 On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Joel Dahl wrote: > The general opinion these days seems to be that the FAQ is in a bad > shape, and I've seen suggestions about what to do with it, like moving > relevant parts to the handbook (or just completely kill the hole thing) > etc. I've found a couple of things that I easily could correct in it, > but with the above things i mind, should I file a PR with some patches > or is it just a waste of time? :-) Yes, please send the corrections. If you wait for all of us interested parties (I am one) to decide on how/where to rearchitect the thing, you'll probably get old and grey in the meantime :-) mcl