From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Mon Jan 30 15:35:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADEDCC7FF2 for ; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:35:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B38B71513; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:35:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA12880; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:35:50 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1cYDzi-000HdL-IN; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:35:50 +0200 Subject: Re: Could somebody look at PR216178? To: lev@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org References: <2cadd04c-7b7c-9963-489d-d211215a1d3f@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Alexander Motin , George Wilson From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <76d1dab3-2c68-0b06-433c-1ee2aed7d10d@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 17:34:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2cadd04c-7b7c-9963-489d-d211215a1d3f@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:35:54 -0000 On 18/01/2017 18:27, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216178 > > I could reproduce it on 10-STABLE and 11-STABLE and I'm afraid, that > this ruin ARC and L2ARC efficiency completely. > Lev, I haven't forgotten about this issue. Unfortunately, I can not devote as much time as I would like to it. I revisited it again and I couldn't spot anything new besides what my old patch was supposed to fix: https://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=24428+0+archive/2016/freebsd-fs/20161106.freebsd-fs I know that George [cc-ed] was going to work on this problem. Perhaps, he has something for you to test or debug. -- Andriy Gapon