From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Oct 28 22:40: 5 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A6937B479 for ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA56262; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:40:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:40:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200010290540.WAA56262@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Subject: Re: ports/22385 Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/22385; it has been noted by GNATS. From: To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/22385 Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 22:39:51 -0700 (PDT) Turns out you need to use ltconfig (GNU libtool) 1.3.4-freebsd-ports (1.385.2.196 1999/12/07 21:47:57) as installed by the libtool-1.3.4_1 port, since it has different behavior than ltconfig (GNU libtool) 1.3.4-freebsd-ports (1.385.2.196 1999/12/07 21:47:57) as installed by the libtool-1.3.4 port. It's probably a problem that there's no way to tell from the version messages that these programs behave differently, and it's probably also a problem that imagemagick depends on the newer one but there's no way for it to inform the system of that. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message