From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 21 00:34:37 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49598106566B for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:34:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87E58FC08 for ; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.98]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Zyeq1g00927AodY510adT0; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:34:37 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([67.180.84.87]) by omta19.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id a0ab1g00r1t3BNj3f0acNX; Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:34:37 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 10DDB9B418; Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:34:34 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 17:34:34 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Rick Macklem Message-ID: <20110421003434.GA18338@icarus.home.lan> References: <20110415140435.GA4278@icarus.home.lan> <977321498.379779.1303337662533.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <977321498.379779.1303337662533.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 00:34:37 -0000 On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 06:14:22PM -0400, Rick Macklem wrote: > > - Has the experimental code been stress-tested? If so, how? I've heard > > of people doing silly things like testing with filesystem benchmark > > utilities -- which pass/work fine, but the instant someone tries > > using something like rsnapshot (like we do), the thing falls apart. > > > Just fyi, Peter Holms (pho@) has volunteered to do some stress testing, > which is now in progress. > > Thanks go to him for doing this, rick Totally awesome. Thank you both for doing this -- I can probably safely speak for the community when I say we all appreciate it. :-) Also, related yet unrelated: our production environment is running the experimental server as of ~48 hours ago, and things seem okay. Our rsync jobs have all passed w/out issue, no anomalies. The stablerestart(5) stuff needs to get dealt with before the switch-to experimental-server-as-default gets flipped on, but I know you'll get to that, Rick. If you need any testing/help from me, just let me know. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB |