From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Mar 10 15:23: 0 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F28A37B401 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:22:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02.attbi.com [204.127.202.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA3943F93 for ; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:22:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by sccrmhc02.attbi.com (sccrmhc02) with ESMTP id <200303102322560020082b6fe>; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 23:22:56 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2ANMtWp064951; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:22:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h2ANMsC6064950; Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:22:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2003 15:22:54 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: "M. Warner Losh" Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wi patch Message-ID: <20030310232254.GA64763@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030301.093910.15267989.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FCuugMFkClbJLl1L" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030301.093910.15267989.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline If memory serves me right, M. Warner Losh wrote: > These patches make my lucent cards almost useful They are in 1Mbps > mode, it seems, but at least they work with a fair amount of > reliability. Don't try to set the media just yet. Hi Warner-- I'm almost hesitant to post this, but I tried this patch, and a Lucent WaveLan Silver card that I have is still a paperweight. I'm running CURRENT (GENERIC kernel) from 6 March on an IBM ThinkPad T21. This includes if_wi.c 1.130 and if_wivar.h 1.15. The card probes like this (copied by hand, so transcription errors are possible): wi0: at port 0x100-0x13f irq 11 function 0 config 1 on pccard0 wi0: 802.11 address: 00:02:2d:2b:93:12 wi0: using Lucent Technologies, WaveLAN/IEEE wi0: Lucent Firmware: Station (6.16.1) wi0: supported rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x0002; event status 0x0080 wi0: timeout in wi_cmd 0x0000; event status 0x0080 wi0: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear. To me, it looks like the patch (which applied cleanly) had no effect. Can I do something else to help fix this? Thanks! Bruce. --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+bR5O2MoxcVugUsMRAr50AKCdJtdep2vK2HgcEyUrJihZFooewQCgidLr a8LmpjgaXHU0bzTY4xxp62w= =1yDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FCuugMFkClbJLl1L-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message