Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 02:52:52 +0000 From: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> To: Harti Brandt <harti@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: netatm: plan for removal unless an active maintainer is found Message-ID: <20060316025252.GB11850@spc.org> In-Reply-To: <20060315091218.E56469@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20060315004530.B5861@fledge.watson.org> <20060315091218.E56469@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > I'm all for this removal. The only two reasons for carrying this around is > that it supports CLIP over SVCs and that the driver for the IDT77211 chips > is HARP-only. I have half of an ngatm driver for these chips and sent them > out two at least two people during the last two years, but never heard > back. I have also code for CLIP over SVCs but due to ENOTIME was not yet > able to make this commit ready. If anybody knows somebody who could finish > the driver it would be great. The CLIP stuff is not so critical - almost > all people use PVCs only. I am one such guilty party. Sadly my time has been completely consumed. I second the removal of netatm. BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060316025252.GB11850>