Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:17:14 -0700 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org> To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mikolaj Golub <trociny@freebsd.org>, vadim_nuclight@mail.ru, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, Kostik Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r222688 - head/sbin/hastd Message-ID: <4DF1466A.1050401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110609192303.GA2433@garage.freebsd.pl> References: <201106041601.p54G1Ut7016697@svn.freebsd.org> <BA66495E-AED3-459F-A5CD-69B91DB359BC@lists.zabbadoz.net> <4DEA653F.7070503@FreeBSD.org> <201106061057.p56Av3u7037614@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <4DED1CC5.1070001@FreeBSD.org> <86wrgvkv67.fsf@kopusha.home.net> <4DF11183.3060806@FreeBSD.org> <20110609192303.GA2433@garage.freebsd.pl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 6/9/2011 12:23 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > I strongly disagree with this patch. The whole proto API is now clean > and elegant. Well, addition of the single flag to indicate that we are waiting for exact amount of data or just *some* date doesn't make it unclear or non-elegant. In fact it makes that API more versatile, so that you can let network layer know exactly what are you trying to achieve. -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DF1466A.1050401>