Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:30:13 -0700 From: Julien Laffaye <kimelto@gmail.com> To: Andrew Brampton <brampton+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSoC:Complete Package support in the pkg_install tools and cleanup Message-ID: <v2ofee671621005041030j7eedf416o9e5b98dd16e72bac@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <u2zd41814901005040315mb53c0a8ejd9baed87454af35c@mail.gmail.com> References: <i2jfee671621005031928m7672c08bk5f6f74cca2b50bad@mail.gmail.com> <u2zd41814901005040315mb53c0a8ejd9baed87454af35c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 3:15 AM, Andrew Brampton <brampton+freebsd@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Julien, > > Glad you got onto the GSoC programme. I'm curious, what benefit is a > complete package over many individual ones? Hi Andrew, If you cant or dont want to use the remote feature of of pkg_add (ex. your packages are built with non default options and you think its overkill to setup a server to distribute them) then you make a complete package. You only have to copy one file (say on an usb device), which is less error prone than 150 files. The global idea is to write a meta port which depends on the desired ports, type `make complete-package`, copy the output file on the machine to bootstrap, pkg_add /path/to/complete-pkg and voila! Regards, Julien
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?v2ofee671621005041030j7eedf416o9e5b98dd16e72bac>