Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:20:48 -0500 From: Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> To: "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com> Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE += a few ports Message-ID: <1240377648.1949.19.camel@balrog.2hip.net> In-Reply-To: <49EE9D51.2040903@p6m7g8.com> References: <49E75438.2080107@p6m7g8.com> <49E95BFA.7080102@p6m7g8.com> <49EE9D51.2040903@p6m7g8.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 00:30 -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > >> editors/vim > >> mail/procmail > >> net-mgmt/net-snmp > >> net-mgmt/nagios > > another: > >=20 > > devel/pth >=20 > Can I mark these unsafe now thats its thaw ? Marking them unsafe will only effect the port build, it won't effect the packages. So I would say it should be completely safe to have marked them even during freeze, but I'll defer to portmgr... robert. --=20 Robert Noland <rnoland@FreeBSD.org> FreeBSD --=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAknuqTAACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPgpwCfczE9WZoE3WdLUAwkR2hlXosH 4xAAmwQg9c+g80wcRPUfqFyjGEMtynXJ =+Jqi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-dapc3OW5qHc1wNMYoWb6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1240377648.1949.19.camel>