From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 25 19:15:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426F1106568D for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA0778FC28 for ; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:15:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30009 invoked by uid 399); 25 Aug 2009 19:15:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 25 Aug 2009 19:15:44 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4A94385A.1000405@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:15:38 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Radovanovic References: <20090825034054.2d57e733@dev.lan.Awfulhak.org> <4A94325D.6070201@FreeBSD.org> <4A9436A7.2020108@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4A9436A7.2020108@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org, Brian Somers Subject: Re: Deprecating ps(1)s -w switch X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:15:47 -0000 Ivan Radovanovic wrote: > So, if the developer is presented with a task of developing utility to > list running processes on the machine the right way to solve this > problem is to implement it exactly the way the ps is implemented (ie, to > please some aesthetic criteria (ie to format output to some width) > rather than to focus on functionality)? If you're developing your own app to display running processes implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the question at hand. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection