From owner-freebsd-current Mon Oct 21 02:30:03 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id CAA03572 for current-outgoing; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 02:30:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from haywire.DIALix.COM (haywire.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.65]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id CAA03536 for ; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 02:29:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from news@localhost) by haywire.DIALix.COM (8.7.6/8.7.3) id RAA15558 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Oct 1996 17:29:50 +0800 (WST) Received: from GATEWAY by haywire.DIALix.COM with netnews for freebsd-current@freebsd.org (problems to: usenet@haywire.dialix.com) To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: 21 Oct 1996 09:29:49 GMT From: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM (Peter Wemm) Message-ID: <54ffqd$e2l$1@haywire.DIALix.COM> Organization: DIALix Services, Perth, Australia. References: <199610200843.QAA17050@spinner.DIALix.COM> Subject: Re: sendmail-8.8.2 ready to go.. Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In article <199610200924.LAA02036@uriah.heep.sax.de>, j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) writes: > As Peter Wemm wrote: >> - persistant host status > > Whatsat? Take freefall for example. If a sendmail queue run process discovers that a host is down, it can record the status. On freefall, we've typically had a fair few queue running processes going in parallel, and each one has to time out on it's own to discover that the host is down, if you turn on persistant host status you can have all sendmails sharing the "yes/no" deliverability status. As a result, you waste far less resources with futile delivery attempts. On the downside, hosts retried far less often so transient problems are slower to clear... but even that isn't so bad because you can handle a much larger queue with ease. >> - special ruleset hooks for spam hunting and user filtering > > Ahhh! :-) I very much like the idea of a .db file containing (say): #Domainname Message moneyworld.com Get stuffed! Naturally, this is a hypothetical example.. I can't imagine why anybody would want to block such fine net-citizens like them.. :-) -Peter