From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 4 10:16:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927FE106566C; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:16:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A6CA8FC0C; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ds4.des.no (des.no [84.49.246.2]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9247E6D41B; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 10:16:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ds4.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5CF27844E9; Fri, 4 Dec 2009 11:16:37 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Kostik Belousov References: <200911261349.nAQDnco2083469@svn.freebsd.org> <200912021926.02346.fluffy@fluffy.khv.ru> <20091202132904.GH2368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 11:16:37 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20091202132904.GH2368@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> (Kostik Belousov's message of "Wed, 2 Dec 2009 15:29:04 +0200") Message-ID: <86pr6vvybe.fsf@ds4.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.95 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Dima Panov , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r199827 - in head: include lib/libc/compat-43 sys/sys X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 10:16:39 -0000 Kostik Belousov writes: > No. My interpretation of __FreeBSD_version is that the bump indicates > incompatible change in the interfaces. ...or the introduction of a new interface; see for instance r194210, where simon@ bumped it to mark a new OpenSSL version with new features. It is widely used in the ports tree to determine whether a particular patch should be applied. (actually, that's precisely the reason why __FreeBSD_version was introduced, and it lived in userland for a while before eivind@ moved it into the kernel in 1998) > Sometime it is used to mark the point where big changes hit the tree, > possibly not related to interface change. Bumps are cheap, better one too many than one too few. > Also, __FreeBSD_version denotes the kernel "version". No, it has been bumped for libc changes in the past. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no