From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  8 13:40:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id C938316A4D0; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 13:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A10FD16A4CE; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 13:40:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 30B6C43D39; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 13:40:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1FC762A7EA; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 13:40:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from peter@wemm.org)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.20031208155228.jhb@FreeBSD.org> 
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 13:40:31 -0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Message-Id: <20031208214031.1FC762A7EA@canning.wemm.org>
cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 43467 for review 
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 21:40:37 -0000

John Baldwin wrote:
> 
> On 05-Dec-2003 Peter Wemm wrote:
> > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=43467
> > 
> > Change 43467 by peter@peter_daintree on 2003/12/05 14:22:30
> > 
> >       Integ -b i386_hammer -I.  This catches up with jhb's changes.
> >       One change isn't relevant because there is no way to compile out
> >       the apic code on amd64, so we dont need the apic stubs.
> 
> Umm you don't want all this.  You want mp_maxid to be right, and if
> you change this this is going to break mp_maxid for amd64. :(

Indeed.  See change 43515...

Cheers,
-Peter
--
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5