From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 26 22:58:21 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98EC14C
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:58:21 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from superbisquit@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CAE1286
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:58:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id eh20so41816obb.39
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=ZS5qlZYPvgYKwPNVz3s0ur3Hafrf0FAhjWSH5bQUZwk=;
 b=N4oGtzFQ5q+6nxbNmMtribtbVCiNbW12iK3ctXKipD2rSdwRVXEONebTvymQlzz8tM
 0maLU2BX6/vJ97swoezlevm2kK29Y9Cn0n02SerfpQz3tvJymF4nblcWBkmSSb93BAdo
 tjJQZ71vrF/1dQUZk9ex9gHVm84wgdciFSepSwUWIkcNCiJkKWR1EwkzQktE/5zY6gUd
 LeXvAn+Hb0Ce3oRL7Anb0x1MAW+TQadMK8A+cUY0PvC3hA9YUy+I4/TfIbu75RT04NKm
 yotzuRt9egGnYHrf45FSw+IEHO6o4pxHjMUxn+RqjgKv5nSp3vfa12hBVKcLijvErK+I
 7JLw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.133.14 with SMTP id oy14mr1595046oeb.84.1372287501304;
 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.115.194 with HTTP; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 15:58:21 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALG4x-VnWsjFtMkrGoonV2MXLJBdC7qZrWJ1fVbJR-cjp5BCUQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALG4x-VnWsjFtMkrGoonV2MXLJBdC7qZrWJ1fVbJR-cjp5BCUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:58:21 -0400
Message-ID: <CA+WntOuN0qgirdFFfoHqsnpUYePqfvP5YpCEtfdFj7H2fmTZmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comparing Mutiqueue Support Linux vs FreeBSD
From: Super Bisquit <superbisquit@gmail.com>
To: Takuya ASADA <syuu@dokukino.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:58:21 -0000

If someone ports the ethtool to FreeBSD, it will only work on the
i386/AMD64/ PC98 architectures.
Perhaps having these suggestions as options for the kernel/GENERIC conf
files would be better?


On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Takuya ASADA <syuu@dokukino.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Because there was an discussion about new APIs to provide better support
> for high performance NICs in Ottawa DevSummit BoF, I wrote a note about
> "How Linux doing it" in that area.
>
> I haven't get a enough chance to talk about it in the summit, but I decided
> to upload the note on a Wiki.
>
> Here's a link:
>
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/201305DevSummit/NetworkReceivePerformance/ComparingMutiqueueSupportLinuxvsFreeBSD
>
> I hope it helps to decide what kind of interfaces/features do we need on
> FreeBSD.
>
> Takuya ASADA
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-net@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-net-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>