From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 20:42:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37EC016A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:42:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED1CB43D41 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:42:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noacks@swbell.net@70.240.177.173 with login) by smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Feb 2005 20:42:27 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE323633A; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:42:26 -0600 (CST) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29019-02; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:42:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (optimator [192.168.1.11]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C876336; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:42:23 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <421501A0.3040707@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:42:08 -0600 From: Jon Noack User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: henrysu@nttmcl.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org cc: delphij@delphij.net Subject: Re: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 20:42:28 -0000 Henry Su wrote: > You can configure both NIC as /32. You also need proxy arp installed and > listen on both NIC. Then the traffic should be able to follow between two > NICs. Since Proxy ARP always answers its MAC to clients, so the clients can > always send traffic to em1 or em0. Based on client's mac entry in the ARP > table, client to client traffic is easily transferred. Other traffic should > be able to direct to default gateway. I gave this a shot and failed miserably. Admittedly, I know little-to-nothing about arp, so hopefully it's obvious why I failed. I have this in my /etc/rc.conf: network_interfaces="fxp0 fxp1 lo0" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.0.0.4 netmask 255.255.255.255 link0" ifconfig_fxp1="inet 10.0.0.5 netmask 255.255.255.255 link0" defaultrouter="10.0.0.1" Created an arp table file called /etc/arp.table (built-in dual fxps so the macs are actually consecutive): 10.0.0.4 00:01:02:03:04:06 pub 10.0.0.5 00:01:02:03:04:05 pub And had this in /etc/rc.local: /usr/sbin/arp -f /etc/arp.table On boot I ended up with the following error message and a blank arp table: set: proxy entry exists for non 802 device Do I need to add in some static routes to make this work? What am I missing? Would this make it possible to have each adapter/IP use a different gateway? I ask because I have 2 T1s and I'm curious if a single machine could utilize both. It's an SMP box so I was thinking of running 2 peered instances of Squid on separate IP addresses with each IP address using one of the T1s as the gateway. That way I could force my power users through one connection and everyone else through the other while still gaining the benefit of caching everything for everyone. It's probably needlessly complicated, but it sounds fun... ;-) Jon > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Xin LI > Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 10:12 AM > To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Two NIC's connected to same subnet: routing question > > > Dear folks, > > I think I got confused with the routing problem we will have when at > least two NIC's are connected into the same subnet. > > The scenario: > em0: 192.168.0.1/24 > em1: 192.168.0.2/24 > > We can't simply configure like this, since 192.168.0.0/24 network route > exists as soon as either em0 or em1 is up. A workaround for this is > that we assign 192.168.0.2/32 for em1, but that has another issue that > all traffics will go through em0 for "outgoing", say, outside the > current network. > > A google of the issue has indicated that the "Move ARP out of routing > table" work done last April should have resolved this, as "With this > change it is possible to have more than one interface in the same IP > subnet and layer 2 broadcast domain.". However, what I have found from > our mailing list archive says only to assign /32 IP address, or remove > routing item from route table, which is essentially identical to the /32 > solution. > > So is there any way to utilize the both NIC's? I think I have been > confused :-( > > Cheers, > -- > Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/