From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 25 16:30:21 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2FE16A41F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jsmith@drexel.edu) Received: from shim1.irt.drexel.edu (shim1.irt.drexel.edu [144.118.29.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8348243D53 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jsmith@drexel.edu) Received: from conversion-daemon.shim1.irt.drexel.edu by shim1.irt.drexel.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0ILS00E01DQMG0@shim1.irt.drexel.edu> for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:30:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vorpal.math.drexel.edu (vorpal.math.drexel.edu [129.25.6.250]) by shim1.irt.drexel.edu (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0ILS00EYFDUGLB@shim1.irt.drexel.edu> for freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:30:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (vorpal.math.drexel.edu [129.25.6.250]) by vorpal.math.drexel.edu (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j7PGRvZ9001129 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:27:57 -0400 (EDT envelope-from jsmith@drexel.edu) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 12:30:15 -0400 From: "Justin R. Smith" To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-id: <430DF217.2020908@drexel.edu> Organization: Drexel University MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050811) Cc: Subject: Hyperthreading degrades performance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 16:30:21 -0000 This is in reply to the people who said this because of cache-contention. Has anyone benchmarked this? There's an article http://www.2cpu.com/articles/41_1.html that benchmarks hyperthreading in Linux and shows a modest (~29%) improvement in performance --- depending on applications (with java showing degradation of performance). Perhaps the linux sheduler does things differently...