From owner-freebsd-net  Tue Oct 24 21:26:16 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from rapidnet.com (rapidnet.com [205.164.216.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD56537B479
	for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 21:26:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (nick@localhost)
	by rapidnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA13080;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:25:17 -0600 (MDT)
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 22:25:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Nick Rogness <nick@rapidnet.com>
To: Mike Hoskins <mike@adept.org>
Cc: Elliott Perrin <eperrin@bigorbit.com>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Three interface routing problem
In-Reply-To: <20001025040747.307DB9EE01@snafu.adept.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010242219190.98567-100000@rapidnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, 24 Oct 2000, Mike Hoskins wrote:

> > xl0 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
> > xl1 xxx.xxx.xxx.115  netmask 255.255.255.248
> > xl2 xxx.xxx.xxx..129 netmask 255.255.255.240
> 
> Do we support VLSM?

	I've never had a problem using them.  The above addresses seem to
	be valid in their given subnets.


Nick Rogness
- Drive defensively.  Buy a tank.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message