From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 8 17:50:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16E00EC0 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.qcislands.net (mail.qcislands.net [23.235.65.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC30429B9 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2014 17:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [69.176.161.72] (helo=[192.168.0.170]) by mail.qcislands.net with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Wth9D-000L9B-4O; Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:44:47 -0700 Message-ID: <5394A105.5040006@paz.bz> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 10:44:37 -0700 From: Jim Pazarena User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg 2 ng conversion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2014 17:50:13 -0000 On 2014-05-28 11:30 AM, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > Hello, > > On 5/28/14, 2:13 PM, Jim Pazarena wrote: >> >> On a new/fresh install, V10, should a person immediately place >> "WITH_PKGNG=yes" in the make.conf ? And then is it not required >> to run pkg2ng ? Or is it implied? It seems not, but I cannot find >> documentation in this respect. > > In my experience it is unnecessary to add "WITH_PKGNG=yes" in a fresh > FreeBSD 10 box, and it is certainly not necessary to run pkg2ng since > there are no installed packages. > > The pkg_* tools are not included in FreeBSD 10 and the pkg(ng) system is > the default. > this process is a little confusing. do I still need to run "portsnap fetch" ? Or does this need to be replaced with some other ng style update?