From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 20:11:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF2B16A4AB; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3658813C44C; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l0IJpiCR002581; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:51:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l0IJpiXk002578; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:51:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:51:44 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: "David O'Brien" In-Reply-To: <20070118185616.GA67767@dragon.NUXI.org> Message-ID: <20070118115113.U2516@ns1.feral.com> References: <200701181355.l0IDtMFu003540@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070118185616.GA67767@dragon.NUXI.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Gleb Smirnoff , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netgraph ng_ppp.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 20:11:12 -0000 > /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/ppp/../../../netgraph/ng_ppp.c: In function `ng_ppp_rcvdata': > /usr/src/sys/modules/netgraph/ppp/../../../netgraph/ng_ppp.c:1287: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type > *** Error code 1 > > I commented out the KASSERT in order to get the kernel buildable again. > Would you be able to take a look at the logic in the KASSERT? I'd rather > not guess what you'd like there and possibly get it wrong. > thanks, Fools rush in (me). I changed the logic.