From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 9 22:50:50 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBE637B401; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:50:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC55843F75; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 22:50:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.9/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h7A5ofFL072826; Sat, 9 Aug 2003 23:50:41 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Sat, 09 Aug 2003 23:50:13 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030809.235013.66797207.imp@bsdimp.com> To: wkb@freebie.xs4all.nl From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030809095333.GB47690@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <20030809020121.GC1741@wantadilla.lemis.com> <7545.1060403931@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030809095333.GB47690@freebie.xs4all.nl> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: grog@freebsd.org cc: phk@phk.freebsd.dk cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GEOM/vinum compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 05:50:50 -0000 In message: <20030809095333.GB47690@freebie.xs4all.nl> Wilko Bulte writes: : On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 06:38:51AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: : > In message <20030809020121.GC1741@wantadilla.lemis.com>, "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" : > writes: : > : > >> and it seems that vinum does not respect the D_NOGIANT flag which : > >> GEOM recently started setting. : > > : > >Probably because it didn't know about it. As I've said before, it : > >would be nice to be informed about the changes you're making, : > >particularly given your stated intention of doing no work on Vinum. : > : > I had the choice between supporting sos@ effort to de-Giantize ATA : > or wait for the non-maintainer of vinum to possibly react to his email : : Come on.. a bit of politeness goes a long way.. As would a little technical information. It does no harm to send off a message that tells of API breakage/introduction. : > so I chose the former as being more beneficial to the project. Warner