From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Fri Dec 23 01:18:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3867C8C403; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from mail.strugglingcoder.info (strugglingcoder.info [104.236.146.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3DBD10EC; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hiren@strugglingcoder.info) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.1.3]) (Authenticated sender: hiren@strugglingcoder.info) by mail.strugglingcoder.info (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B64BF17A00; Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:18:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:18:31 -0800 From: hiren panchasara To: Andrey Chernov Cc: cem@freebsd.org, Ngie Cooper , src-committers , svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r310433 - head/lib/libc/stdio Message-ID: <20161223011831.GI82166@strugglingcoder.info> References: <201612222230.uBMMUge9075128@repo.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="dYuLH7fbMjVsPkFl" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:18:37 -0000 --dYuLH7fbMjVsPkFl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/23/16 at 03:05P, Andrey Chernov wrote: > On 23.12.2016 1:39, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > This was unjustified and inappropriate. >=20 > I don't think so. While being able to back it out or fix it by another > way by yourself, you just doing nothing for several days. Your personal > reasons of inability to act properly so long time weights less than > project consistency at whole, so backing it out from anybody is > justified and appropriate in such situations. Conrad, As Andrey rightly said, you didn't respond to all raised concerns neither did you revert your commit (which was the majority vote anyways). So I'd say, it is totally justified and appropriate. Cheers, Hiren --dYuLH7fbMjVsPkFl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAABCgBmBQJYXHtkXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRBNEUyMEZBMUQ4Nzg4RjNGMTdFNjZGMDI4 QjkyNTBFMTU2M0VERkU1AAoJEIuSUOFWPt/lpccH/3vo2cFoLe0r3e7P746ns8oR U2eHFsnjJguaCeUQ9Q9se9SlNDP5wxCGZBAjMyp0SN33zkLd3339h1SjSUeI+V34 XkXrh0ZzvEhbh9+rDJGfk4v7oHZo18Cwc9DQi+RRybAhEnAt3FTuTbPO4klwSJri UXKB4NPGS9AGyhaPEImRvGAApiJMzqVyTr+LUajQtH1vTpGQu8Tx4jmg3O5GHCoP 5Co/VZWsUvcHhlvmRQnTUeQJT76VpU1m+kYI621Bcj+tzTQsOQR7sjQTToFnPZBW rUr6oidrd6FbG2y0Cmte1JhapuRzqWNvoHlSGJEIwhgUOxVa0XMFp6ARC+7EGFI= =fZ4z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dYuLH7fbMjVsPkFl--