Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 18:28:43 GMT From: Adam David <adam@veda.is> To: andreas@klemm.gtn.COM (Andreas Klemm) Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz is out Message-ID: <199707301828.SAA08049@ubiq.veda.is> References: <19970716201748.60325@gtn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>I found out, that there are new apache SSLeay patches out. >FTP Directory: ftp://ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/SSL/ > README . . . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:58] 6k > README.066 . . . . . . . . . . . [May 29 15:59] 2k > README.080 . . . . . . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 5k > SSLeay-0.6.6.patch1. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 1k > SSLeay-0.6.6.tar.gz. . . . . . . [May 29 17:15] 814k > SSLeay-0.8.0.README. . . . . . . [Jul 1 12:44] 1k > SSLeay-0.8.0.tar.gz. . . . . . . [Jul 3 15:12] 968k > apache_1.1.1+1.3.ssl.tar.gz. . . [Jul 16 1996] 21k > apache_1.2.0+ssl_1.8.tar.gz. . . [Jul 7 09:56] 24k > apache_1.2b10+ssl_1.6.tar.gz . . [May 3 21:41] 22k >Do you plan to upgrade the apache port with that changes >so that a secure server would be made possible ? And does this mean SSLeay-0.8 is needed as a separate port from -0.6.6 ? (i.e. does anything worthwhile depend on the previous version, either within the ports tree or outside of it?) :From the README: VERY IMPORTANCE NOTICE SSLeay 0.8.0 IS NOT compatible with SSLeay 0.6.6 There are various subtle and obvious changes to the library so if an application says it requires SSLeay 0.6.6, don't complain to me when you find it does not work under SSLeay 0.8 [...] eric 25-Jun-1997 -- Adam David <adam@veda.is>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707301828.SAA08049>