From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jul 3 02:35:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA22051 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:35:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA22040 for ; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 02:35:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA20606; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 09:34:51 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id LAA25015; Fri, 3 Jul 1998 11:34:51 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <19980703113450.13615@follo.net> Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 11:34:50 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how about including dummynet in 2.2.7 ? References: <19980703111231.42617@follo.net> <199807030800.KAA13807@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i In-Reply-To: <199807030800.KAA13807@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>; from Luigi Rizzo on Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 10:00:47AM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > The only problem I can see with Luigi's changes is I believe that they > > will screw the ipfw interface again (right, Luigi?) > > depends on what you mean for 'screw up' ... I mean that it isn't binary compatible; if somebody compile a kernel after this change, they'll also have to re-compile ipfw. After reading your comments, I'm still not certain if this is the case. They sounded like they _might_ be implementable without changing the kernel<->userland interface. So - _do_ this break ipfw binary compatibility (apart from people not being able to use the extensions with the old binaries, of course)? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message