Date: Fri, 3 Jul 1998 11:34:50 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: how about including dummynet in 2.2.7 ? Message-ID: <19980703113450.13615@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199807030800.KAA13807@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>; from Luigi Rizzo on Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 10:00:47AM %2B0200 References: <19980703111231.42617@follo.net> <199807030800.KAA13807@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 03, 1998 at 10:00:47AM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > The only problem I can see with Luigi's changes is I believe that they > > will screw the ipfw interface again (right, Luigi?) > > depends on what you mean for 'screw up' ... I mean that it isn't binary compatible; if somebody compile a kernel after this change, they'll also have to re-compile ipfw. After reading your comments, I'm still not certain if this is the case. They sounded like they _might_ be implementable without changing the kernel<->userland interface. So - _do_ this break ipfw binary compatibility (apart from people not being able to use the extensions with the old binaries, of course)? Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980703113450.13615>