From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 07:46:36 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 36A962D4 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mario.brtsvcs.net (mario.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:0:a400::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BD25223 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-71-59-211-166.hsd1.or.comcast.net [71.59.211.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mario.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBF832C160D for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (ivy.libssl.so [IPv6:2601:7:2580:674:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B30E16D6 for ; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 23:46:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <547ACB53.6050807@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 23:46:27 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Should freebsd-update case-fold release identifiers? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 07:46:36 -0000 I upgraded a machine from 10.0 to 10.1 tonight. Ran in this odd little quirk: # freebsd-update -r 10.1-release upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 10.0-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic world/base The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: world/doc world/games Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-release from update2.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-release from update5.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-release from update4.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-release from update6.freebsd.org... failed. Fetching metadata signature for 10.1-release from update3.freebsd.org... failed. No mirrors remaining, giving up. # It seems to me that the case of the word "release" shouldn't matter. The tool should either do a case-insensitive match, or case-fold to upper, since that's what all release identifiers use anyway.