From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 13 13:10:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49C89E6 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 903912109 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r8DDA1uD083034 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r8DDA1tw083033; Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201309131310.r8DDA1tw083033@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: kaltheat@googlemail.com Subject: Re: ports/182025: net/tigervnc can't be built after upgrade of port to 1.3.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: kaltheat@googlemail.com List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:10:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/182025; it has been noted by GNATS. From: kaltheat@googlemail.com To: Koichiro IWAO Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/182025: net/tigervnc can't be built after upgrade of port to 1.3.0 Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:00:38 +0200 On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 09:54:28AM +0900, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > Can you see the patch named patch-hw-vnc-off-by-one-error[1] in > files directory? It's supposed to be exist. If it exists, the patch is > not applied for some reason. I couldn't see that file. It turned out that my local portstree was broken. I removed and refetched it and then this patch appeared. Now it builds just fine. Sorry for the noice ... Regards, kaltheat