From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Jan 11 19:31:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-ports
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA20588
          for ports-outgoing; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:31:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (precipice.shockwave.com [171.69.108.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA20572
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:31:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost.shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id TAA12509 for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:31:14 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199601120331.TAA12509@precipice.shockwave.com>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: wither tcl / tk shared libraries?
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 1996 19:31:13 -0800
From: Paul Traina <pst@shockwave.com>
Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

I'd like to not continue the tradition of making shared library support
for tcl/tk & friends with the next release of the ports, given that the
authors refuse to support this even though the gnu configure stuff almost
does.

It's a real pain in the butt to track this stuff if we maintain shared libraries.

Objections?