From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec 17 09:04:14 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA19488
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:04:14 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from j51.com (j51.com [209.94.121.51])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA19482
          for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 09:04:12 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from drew@j51.com)
Received: (from drew@localhost) by j51.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) id MAA07816 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:05:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Drew C Morone <drew@j51.com>
Message-Id: <199812171705.MAA07816@j51.com>
Subject: natd vs. fwtk
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 12:05:02 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8b]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

How much control do you have over the proxying with natd? I need to set
very specific rules and log stuff extensively. Would it be better to
use fwtk in this case?

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message