From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 26 17:47:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9384616A41F for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D3C43D48 for ; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:47:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.30.70.180]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39AB01A3C24; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07DA3513C1; Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:47:38 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 13:47:38 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway To: Emanuel Strobl Message-ID: <20050926174738.GA57284@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200509261847.35558@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AhhlLboLdkugWU4S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200509261847.35558@harrymail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4BSD/ULE numbers... X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 17:47:40 -0000 --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 06:47:27PM +0200, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I tried ULE with BETA5 and for me it felt a bit sluggish when making port= s. > So I did some "realworld" simulation and compared 4BSD/ULE to see what=20 > numbers tell me. And the prooved my feeling right. > It seems that ULE is priorizing nice a little higher, but in general the= =20 > output of the 4 BSD machine is higher and finishing the tests took not so= =20 > long as with ULE, especially the "make configure" differs horribly. That's consistent with my testing. ULE seems a bit more stable now in 6.0 (except on my large SMP machines, which reboot spontaneously under moderate load), but it doesn't perform as well as 4BSD under real application workloads. Kris --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDODQ6Wry0BWjoQKURAqx5AKDHihESlAtreSNV4R2byMHh3KIYjACePbaC SpQIvzJAYqGepo6V+C+rac0= =GErx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AhhlLboLdkugWU4S--